>>1404542No, I meant that it was ridiculous to have to point out a fact that everyone knows, let alone assert it.
>>1404589>liking lolis isn't pedophilia>But why is pedophilia wrongSeriously? I really did not think this needed to be discussed. It is an extreme sexual perversion, just about as degenerate as you can get. Again, you mix up the law with morality. Not everything that is wrong is illegal, nor can it ever be. A naked child shouldn't be sexual, but it is sexualized by pedophiles, the ones you so ardently defend it seems.
And for the second point, an example: Suppose a guy is married to a good wife, but he goes out and has an affair. The wife, and no one else, ever finds out. There is no measurable harmful effect from his action, yet it is still wrong, right? Why? Because the husband was not faithful to his wife. His unfaithfulness did not cause any harm, but it was still wrong, it was still real. And if you feel like that is perfectly ok, that he did nothing wrong, reverse the roles; your wife, or heck your loli waifu, cheated on you, would you feel it was wrong for her to do so? You can even be unfaithful to a spouse in your own mind, say if you are constantly indulging in the thought of women other than your wife. Again, don't think that is wrong? What if all day she was thinking of someone other than you? Something doesn't have to cause harm for it to be wrong. Another good example, lying. What if you had a good, kind friend. But you found out that they had been lying to your face the whole time you knew them, manipulating you for their own gain, or just for their sick entertainment? Was it wrong for them to do it only when you found out, or was it really just wrong to do the whole time through? Is every intangible, unseen and unfelt injustice really of no consequence, perfectly fine as long as no one finds out?
