>>1423995>it'll likely apply to how you see ball trajectories in sports like badmintonNo, because racquet sports use both eyes. Eye dominance is only an issue when you need to use a sight, because it only interfaces with one eye.
Eye dominance is hugely misunderstood, probably because the term has no relevance to what it actually is. Your "dominant eye" is just the eye used by your built-in aiming system*, and everyone has a dominant eye. To find your dominant eye, just lock your vision on to anything nearby, and notice that however you move your head your vision stays centred on it. Now quickly point at the thing, before you have time to think. Close either eye and see which eye the finger is over the target for. Obviously it will be one eye or the other, which is why everyone has a dominant eye.
It is, of course, possible to aim stuff using your non-dominant eye, especially when you're using a monocular sight. The issue is that your default aiming, done by your unconscious brain, always lines things up for your dominant eye. This works with your finger, this works with a bow, this works with a handgun. Mental plasticity is a great thing.
Your dominant eye is simply not relevant, though, in any activity where you don't have to interface a tool with a specific eye. You can shoot a handgun from the hip, regardless of which hand is your dominant hand and which eye is your dominant eye. Golfers don't look at the ball at all, they look at where it's going. Jugglers don't look at their hands, they look at the top of the arc and extrapolate where the balls will go. You only need to worry about your dominant eye in situations where you need to quickly hand over from aiming with your eye to aiming with a tool, for example barricade shooting or biathlon. Presumably also archery because the bow doesn't reload and recock itself, but I don't speak from firsthand experience there.
* which you have because you evolved from a predator that threw stuff at stuff