>>1424295>if his mobo has a chipset it'll be fineNo, only if his computer is old enough to vote. You're absolutely right about core2-era computers, but that's not how things work now.
First core-i processors (2008) moved the graphics into the processor, the only thing left in the chipset was some PHYs and a switch so the same pins could drive the PHYs or the x16 slot. Every processor since has followed suit, only major difference is that the video outputs no-longer share pins with the x16 lanes, so as to enable multi-monitor, Optimus, and so on.
Nowadays, both Intel and AMD sell processors with failed-and-disabled graphics (Intel calls them F and KF, AMD doesn't really distinguish them and sprinkles them around the low end, you can spot them because they don't have PCIe 4.0), and AMD manufactures CPUs with no graphics at all (AM5 reverses this decision because customers found it annoying, though expect to still see failed-graphics processors on AM5). These processors will not produce graphics even if the motherboard has the ports, because there is no graphics device to produce the graphics.
