>>1500898>What does the small animated child resemble then?What does this vodeo game character resemble? A man, right? It's actually a picture of a real person.
So, you know that when you play this Game your objective is to "kill" this character when you face it, right? You're even encouraged to torture him to death in gruesome ways.
And yet, we know for a fact that video games don't cause real life violence.
I'm fact I've played countless violent games, and I'm not even specially violent as a person. I don't like violence, I don't engage in violence.
>When someone is drawn in anime, it’s easy to tell what species they are. In this case, a loli is an artistic representation of a human girlSo?
>A very young human girl. Or do you mean to tell me that they aren’t human, but they happen to resemble humansThey're fictional, just as Mortal Kombat characters are fictional. Anime characters and video game characters often represent humans, and they're all equally fictional, even if they're actually photos.
>If I drew furry porn (you’d catch me dead before I did that), you would be under no illusion as to what the features representIf you drew that, I wouldn't be your friend as a matter of taste but I would still defend your right to do so.
>You are drawing humans in a particular art style.And this creating fictional characters.
>All the hoops you try to jump through to say you aren’t attracted to fake children is bewildering.You have called "fake" just now.
Who's the victim if we draw dogs, cats, or children put into sexual situations?
Same answer as if I ask you who's the victim when we fight against characters in video games.
