>>1514432if you mean the edit, as far as I know:
>it's at 1.15 speed (15% faster)>it's some part around the start pasted with a part of the end>it had some quality lost due the webm conversion. If you want the low quality part, you could probably do something similar with a low pass filter in audacity
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ADcrgWCYhqgIt'd be like in the video, but with increased speed instead of reduced.
