>>419577>agefuck off
>gender fuck off
>weight (for material strength requirements)light enought so I never had to worry about it
>on average how many times a day do you use the toilet6-7
>out of the 3 solutions, which do you prefer1) Learning to operate it properly sounds like a hassle (hitting the target, avoiding splash-back onto the head, etc) and would probably require sitting differently. But I can see how it would work once you'd have aquired the skills.
2) How does it know where my ass is? At least you could set it up to avoid splashback. Sounds over-engineered and failure-prone as fuck though.
3) That's a janky solution combining the worst of 1) and 2) - hard pass.
I would like none of these. If you put a gun to my head and forced me, I'd pick number 1.
>how much would you be willing to pay for your preferred solutionzilch
>any feedback of what you like and what you think could change or anything you want to sayI'd like to see the numbers. What's the footprint of a sheet of toilet paper and how does it compare? Your solutions require water, electricity and much higher initial investment (even ecologically - plastic, electronics, aluminium are crazy bad for the enviroment while wood for paper at least regrows). I'm not disputing your solutions ultimately come out ahead, I'd just like to know how long I would have to use them (without them breaking down) so they equal out (ecological break-even).
I have a suspicion you solutions are only more sanitary in ideal circumstances. 3 is particularly egregious as there's bound to be some urin or fecal matter on a permanent nozzle and then you blast the bacteria back onto your ass...
None of these diagrams address one burning question though: How do you get dry after using them? If you have to wipe, it sort of defeats the purpose, doesn't it? And if you have to wait 2 minutes for the bowl to blow-dry your ass, I'd rather avoid at altogether. Once I'm done shitting, I'd like to leave, please.
