>>561895oops. once I saw this one
>>561843it seemed so much better than mine (he/she erased the old coin, used a nice font, flipped it, etc.,) I conceded defeat because I was doing it wrong. I'm guessing that he/she simply rotated the text rather than the cumbersome approach I was planning.
seriously, thanks, but look at
>>561843 again and love it like I do.