>>677705My point is that there was obviously not a restore point to restore, and it was obvious that talking someone through reenabling system restore would be a colossal waste of time.
My point was that blaming system restore for not being able to restore a backup that doesn't exist was ridiculous, it was obvious it was never going to work, it was pointed out in the thread already that system restore had been turned off, and all
>>677636 was was a pathetic attempt to deflect blame for wasting OP's time away from (you).
Hopefully next time you see something like this, you'll know that reenabling backups doesn't reach back through time and recreate data that was never backed up and is now overwritten.
