appearently NASA gets really pissed when trying to sell a moonrock
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2052819/NASA-raids-Dennys-Joann-Davis-74-tries-sell-Neil-Armstrong-moon-dust.htmlthis one stated they let the old lady pee herself and sit in the pee for quite some time just because of some moon"rock"
However considdering this about the moonrocks
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/space/6105902/Moon-rock-given-to-Holland-by-Neil-Armstrong-and-Buzz-Aldrin-is-fake.htmlIt may explain why they are so furious about it
Also im not saying we didnt go to the moon, nor that we cant go into space or anything like that. All im saying is they arent showing is real footage, or at least often not real footage. Some possible reasons:
>van allen belt would have destroyed the tapes either way, and a moonlanding without footage wouldnt be good propaganda>they feared it could go wrong and thus made fake footage in order to cover an eventual failure up and still sell it as success>something is on the moon we arent supposed to know about>we really didnt go to the moonat the very least it seems they dont want anyone to look into the tapes
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2009/jul/16/moon-landing-tapes-erasedand the astronauts dont seem like people that are mentally stable enough to be send into space
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o1S0oObHT0cAlso what is that in pic related?
https://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/jpeg/PIA16204.jpg>>5894589do you have any argument?
>>5894590yes anon, i own all of the 3 channels myself. you got me...
>>5894591i think he got it right there (kind of) that there is a craft like the ISS, and that we simply arent shown whats really done in it and what its for. however i think he suggests its not in space where our minds part i guess.
