>>17607196>muh lens flare proves there's a domekek
>>17607207>Christ you're stupid. The 2001 image was shot on 70 mm film, to be projected on a screen 110 FEET wide, Yet it looks like DOG SHIT compared to the 6x6 Apollo photograph. Everything from that movie is obviously and laughably fake. It was only good for the time period. Hollywood was not capable of photo realistic FX back then.
Go right ahead and post a link to a scan from a 70mm print of the movie. I would love to expose all the places where 2001 looks obviously fake as fuck.
