>>5681525I d-don't know.
>>5681528The blog dear. You clearly referenced it.
That's also wrong, biologically speaking.
Like, not just slightly wrong. High school biology wrong.
In biology, there is a notion of "genotype", which is the all of your genes, and "phenotype", which are the observable traits.
Normally, since you have an equal amount of chromosomes, phenotype and genotype are highly correlated. However, in the cases of excess chromosomes, one of the chromosomes is disabled effectively at random, resulting in a mosaic phenotype.
Someone with X0, also known as Turner syndrome
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turner_syndromewith Triple X syndrome
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triple_X_syndromeTetrasomy X
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tetrasomy_XOr even large amounts of X's are all considered biological females, as they do not have the Y chromosome and they are phenotypically largely identical to normal XX females.
So you've not proven anything, especially given...you haven't proven...I have Trisomy.
Try again. Maybe with something that isn't so easy to look up.
