Quoted By:
>Like seriously if we could do it back in 1960 why would we never go back? Why would we not try to find resources on the moon, why would we not maybe set up a base or something.
I get that moon-hoaxers are trolls looking for a reaction, but I wish they'd come up with 'observations' a bit less painfully retarded than "How could X have possibly happened when non sequitur Y hasn't?"
The most profoundly retarded of these being "How could we go there in the 60's but can't go today with modern technology?"
On the chance you're so ignorant of how "technology" works you meant that as a serious question, OP, here's why,
1) Funding. The average voter today doesn't give a fuck about manned space flight. Therefore, neither do the politicians who want their votes, and that's who NASA gets their budget from.
2) Quit basing your retarded concept of technological advancement as a whole on computers, smartphones, playstations, or microprocessors in general. Arithmetic with 1's and 0's doesn't produce thrust, lift, or any other fundamental mechanic of flight or movement no matter how quickly it's performed. By your logic, the SR-71 is an obvious hoax as well; it's even older than the Apollo program, yet still holds altitude and speed records that nothing today can touch.
tl;dr - anyone who honestly sees credibility in the same retarded questions that moon hoaxers keep asking is too stupid to understand any explanation to the contrary anyway, and are thus not entitled to an opinion on the matter
