= The Myth of Second Hand Smoke. =
'It has been a couple of years since I published this article, and yet people still say silly comments like “scientific evidence is clear.” It is not clear at all. Not that I advocate smoking, but the myth of second hand smoke continues to guide policy makers even though the “studies” are population studies that do not pass muster. Some tobacco companies hired PR firms regarding second-hand smoke, and that has not advanced knowledge- but merely the logical fallacy of if they promote it there must be a reason and hidden agenda — and who could blame people for thinking this way. We are not associated with tobacco, nor receive funding, nor want funding from them. What we want is clear scientific resources.'
http://yourdoctorsorders.com/2009/01/the-myth-of-second-hand-smoke/https://archive.vn/SoACuPassive smokers inhale the equivalent of six cigarettes a year, not enough to cause them any harm. Even those who live with smokers are typically exposed to 0.1 percent of the dangerous components of cigarette smoke inhaled by smokers.
http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/mey92a99https://archive.vns/5EsG9 