>>6260937yeah, he always gets discredited, but never saw a proper reasoning
Hancock talked about the connection of different monuments across the world that point back to 12,5k BC way before Göbekli Tepe did so officially
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2017/04/21/ancient-stone-carvings-confirm-comet-struck-earth-10950bc-wiping/or
http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/695703came out
on the other hand you have people like Zahi Hawass
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q4NnCAZcxHgremember the first guy, Zahi Hawass was/is in charge of excavations in egypt, and pretty much blocks every attempt of any study and appearently never even heard about göbekli tepe. thats a guy that is seen as an authority on the subject. let that sink in
in one of hancocks documentaries, quest for the lost civilization he has a talk with zahi hawass where you see again that he pretty much denies any alternative theory without even considering it
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T5DNvYMtkyk43:55
Now i wonder who is more credible?
IIRC he supports the stoned ape theory though im not really sold on. i do believe shrooms and other drugs helped us develop mentally/spiritually but its role is blown out of proportion i believe
pic related by the way is found across the world over and over again. no idea what its supposed to be though. heard people suggesting its a rudimentary depiction of atlantis, the world tree, the brain. but no idea really. just look up "labirynth petroglyph"
>>6260938its my theory since its the theory i believe to be accurate, not as in "i invented the theory" and substantiate them with info i gathered from all around including people posting in my threads. i always say im pretty much a glorified archiver gathering together info and put it in context.
also you should learn how timezones work appearently
and since you do nothing but insult and argue semantics i assume you have nothing to refute either way and just are shitposting