>>7797402S-sleep tight! *tucks in* <4
>>7797403No, your assertion is that I'm doing it for attention. You have provided no evidence for that claim, which is my point. You n-need to back up your claim if you want it to be taken seriously. And you haven't.
An argument asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. So where is your evidence, not a bunch of assertions with nothing backing it but actual hard evidence that I am doing any of this for attention?
This has nothing to do with "victory"; it's how a fucking argument works dude. I know my own mind, I know how I feel, and I know that I am not doing any of this for attention; there's no victory in proving you wrong. The victory would be in convincing you that I am not doing this for attention, and as the other poster has provided quite a lot of evidence for, you aren't acting in good faith. You came up with what you wanted then tried to throw words around to back it up without actually providing evidence; that's how flat earthers work, not people actually trying to come to a greater understanding like /soc/kler was.
I'm not refusing to list points; I'm asking you _to actually back up literally any of yours_. Stop moving the goal posts and actually provide your hard evidence or take back your statements.
Put up or shut up. Last chance before I go to bed.
>>7797406D-don't worry, if his next reply contains no actual hard evidence, I'm going to sleep.