>>7797291Okay, s-so your point boils down to "you want attention because I say so". Sorry, that's not compelling.
I haven't argued against it because you've provided no actual evidence in support of it. You've provided around 7 logical fallacies, mounds of assertions, and not a single damn speck of evidence that you can read my mind and determine why I do things.
But hey, let's look at your other points:
>You know your own voice and looks don't attract many people onlineI actually went through speech therapy for many years in order to get my voice back to its jersey girl status. I have people regularly ask me to do more vocaroos in threads. I'm not exactly sure where you get this from, frankly.
My voice is my voice, if it's cutesy or not, that's just what it is. I'm not acting; I'm just talking.
>I fail to see why you are trying to ignore this. I'm not ignoring anything. The burden of proof is on you and you've provided no evidence. Try again.
>Of course, I don't expect you to address this head-on. I'm right here, talking to you. This is addressing it head on. You are wrong, I've explained my reasons for using Alice in this very thread, feel free to scroll up if you want to be corrected.
>You'll use the same platitude of "another illogical fallacy, isn't this getting tired, i have work tomorrow bye :^)" Some of us have jobs, not sure what to tell you.
> I'll even let you do that, since it's obvious you don't even want to touch the issue of attention.I've already addressed it. Here. Let me do it again.
1. I don't do this for attention
2. That's it
