>>13985924Yeah that was a good look.
Good.
Lol, why?
>>13985939Oh the one where it spread? No that was just some corporate thing apparently. I meant that because of that happening they implemented the measures which will keep these people from gathering for the one thing they have during christmas.
The only upside is that people got on their case hard about their own planned gatherings so they had to cancel everything themselves as well in spite of their "we know best" attitude.
They're masters of one sided reporting here sadly, and since they're entirely state sponsored and government gud bois they don't have to give a shit about public opinion. Just full steam ahead on propaganda peddling.
Yeah, some of them are unbelievably ingrained in that mindset. Even when cnn and bbc issued retractions on some stories there was just dead silence here when they had been reporting the exact same things.
Yes we're very fortunate to be so well off.
Yeah especially when it's a double increase with the specific reason being that you didn't get one last year.
>>13985949What's good?
