>>11761166>Excellent Integers, Jack>how does that relate to Karma?Well, there's still intent when choosing to let a computer choose an outcome for you.
I'd think the 'lazy' aspect might dilute any good karma a good outcome might merit, while the blowback of a bad outcome might be worse than expected.
>question, though: why "computer choice"? While it could be said "letting the Universe unfold as it Will" is a similar 'lazy' choice, in reality, a good deal of thought & intent goes into letting things happen as something greater than us sees fit to grant us.
>Let's say an important point in time is coming and you manage to avoid a particular outcome this time....Hmm. I think your answer lies in being cognizant of whatever circumstances lead to that something you wish to avoid next time around. Some introspection is necessary-& certain changes-probably need to be engaged, or a negative outcome seems a given. Think faulty science or fuzzy-maths.
As for karma received, your "lack of interest" in personally bettering a situation will probably let any negative energies the chance to grow expotenially against your own lack of countering it. Imbalances to the Nth Power.
>the rest is better to be left 'unknown' or figured out on your own, so as to not alert the others that you've seen it? Finally: discretion is always important. "Know thine enemy" & all that taken into consideration is a means of PROTECTION.
Leaving nothing to ' the unkown' is simply forward thinking...parsing ALL possible outcomes, then choosing what can least cause any blowback.
Thinking "I have no idea; I'll just see what happens" negates personal responsibilities you SHOULD HAVE taken into account.
If you must camouflage, it's an action best applied after deep consideration. In that case, any karma received has 'A for effort' attached to it.
"For every action there's an equal & opposite reaction". Esoterically speaking, choosing the path of least resistance leads to victory. Go bigger. lol
