>>10524876Okay, here goes, FWIW
First, I see this entire op as a way to bring messaging forward...and, as we've seen with BD (which Brennan has eyes on) I have no doubt in my mind that 'posts-with-findable-time-lapses' probably means they are transmiting info to, let's say to the NME, that they are AWARE of something these bad players have, or are thinking of, putting into motion.
Consider a message like that being rec'd by the baad players. What happens next?
▪Comms...that can be traced and monitored. The outcome of which becomes a growing list of entities to KEEP EYES ON.
>as for the real inb4...I've been following since at least last summer.
There have been times, because of certain posts, that I have wondered if it c/b a team effort.
However, since I was, well, 'indoctrinated ' into all this, I have more of a sense that SOME DAY'S WORK are far more serious than others.
That said, when he doesn't engage my posts, for example, I've learned to read what he does engage in a far deeper sense.
On the other hand, they have been plenty of times that my presence alone, in threads where regulars may be sparse, a good portion of his posts ARE directed to me. One time, all of them.
▪Why? I can't really know, but, what if his engaging me was actually a way someone on the 'outside watching' is actually receiving the message as their own. Of course, this is only a theory I have considered -and one which would not hold true for every exchange we have- but, I can see it as a means to let comms flow freely.
▪▪[part of me wonders if I should not have even mentioned such an idea, but, I want to be specific as to why I believe inb4 IS inb4 from what I can SEE.]
>Personally, even if I thought someone else was posting on his behalf, I doubt that I would make that public...just as I do whenever noticing insaftersource have been presented.In the end, messages get sent, received, and eyes that might otherwise not come across such info OPEN.
