>>17252511All of your thoughts are sequences and abstractions; if a brain is made of material, is its thoughts not materialistic as its thinking is derived from the material itself and therefor reducable to the irreducable material of the universe?
Look into Gnostic psychology, this is not a new question or problem. The Gnostics sought to find the irreducable elements of thought, but we percieve the universe through our senses. Our brains concepts are built from touch, taste, smell, sight, and hearing; nobody knows for sure if they are born with more, or recieve more than what they can from the world around them. A Dog can smell a mans emotions, and to the gnostics, even that would have been a product of the irreducable self.
Luciferians to enlightened masters for occult knowledge, they are all derivative of one thing, they are all looking for Gods name in the ocean of piss when the name of god itself is a graven idol. Athiesm is just another way to worship literal chaos and narcissism.
God is reality, reality itself is gods name to us, and one might think god brought light to nothingness, but god is nothingness, too. Like a father birthing a son, God birthed us. Is it wrong then to think God doesn't love us? Would we not exist if God didn't? And that's the maddening thing about it. We are so limited.
I happen to think God is alive and breathing just like any one of us, and I also happen to think God wants us to learn from them. The highest rule if we are to truly be divine is to learn to love, because if we cannot love the things that which we create, if we are to truly create new realities and live forever, if the architecture of the universe is to perpetuate itself on thought alone, then those realities must be based in love as the one and only constraint.
There are many ways to think about this problem, that is the solution I find the most irreducable and beautiful.
