>>20135912>anonymity IS the principleis it or isn't it? bc you literally said right here
>>20135446 that it wasn't. and if it is, then you have a very ass backwards way of supporting an argument.
are you seething over anonymity, spamming, or the jannies seemingly poor judgment? figure it out and form a cohesive argument, you're all over the place stop seething and use your words
