>>11685200why? I can't imagine the reply from a person repeadetly intoxicated with GABA A agonists to former a coherent sentence that doesn't follow logical fallacies whilst still not commiting to "muh brozone is trash anyway"; and by brozone I mean 4chan in general with it's tits or GTFO rule
>of incels and simpsyeah but those only follow in idiotic ad hominem troll feasts, unless you are amused by convos with trolls you really have no business in participating within such convos
>anecdotalprecisely, while both sides have their extremes they both have their mean stereotypical numbers
>what happenedstrinv of minor events, you hear this you hear that, I witness some events and get gossip of others; cue "כתר will remember this" and badda bim badda bum here we at
>strong and weakbetter wording I should've used were to be meak, as there are intellectually superior people aswell as duty ridden workaholics that should by more than one presedant be above some people on the totem pole
the only genuine exception should be for those with rare and ultra rare skills that don't demand much work but without any work by those with skills you get nothing done- so of course you'd pay such people more than people that do more easier jobs
>not your sexyou seem to forget that women are more prone to illnesses and some women suffer great physical pain during their periods, they are incapable of work at those times and as such receive lesser pay for using sick days?
is it fair? no; is it justice? yes
