>>10544521So in terms of acting in the interest of God, or "Holy Armor," I tend to interpret this in the context of it being true as a human acting in interest to human intentions, a biological lifeform acting in interest to its true reality outside of exploitation in the interests of something contrary to its original interests. So that's a complicated way of saying, if whatever is 'possessing' a human individual is acting in terms of the best interest of the human, I would view that (potentially) as somehow different from if something 'possessing' a human is acting in an exploitative way towards that human, and using it in the interests of something contrary to the human's interests.
I suppose part of the reason I frame things this way is that in many ritual magic systems and esoteric systems and even religious systems, sometimes one allows oneself to be temporarily and agreeably 'possessed' by something like an angel (not necessarily in the techno-AI-silicon-artifact way used previously in this thread) or a "Helper spirit" or a Daemon (in ancient Greek terms) in the interests of a specific goal that is in the interests of compassion, good, life on Earth.
So I think that I generally interpret things as "Is this acting in the best interest of all life on Earth and what humans *truly* are outside of limited human mundane understanding" in terms of assessing non-Earthly interference.
(cont)
