>>15969053>Explain how the underside of the upper clouds are have sun shining on themUndersides of the clouds is dark meaning the Sun is above them, are we talking about the same pic ? You just said see above you should tag the post.
>No, its a good metaphor. It matches basis for your argument.>Snow exists in different places through the year so the Earth is roundNon sequitur
>Snow is not reflective enough, there is not enough snow regardless, there are no glaciers. Post proof.>Post proof.Picrel
>I'm talking about 0° sunriseThat's not when the shadow happen but
>Inb4 prove itFair enough goes for you too
>Exactly, when the sun is below the horizonOK, slip of the keyboard, I meant later all my arguments state that. Duh me
>Nice fallacy, the burden of proof is on you to prove it does happen.No, you put the claim forward, prove it. If it can't be proven don't use it as an argument