>>10887149You don't have a refutation because you are stupid. You form your opinions by listening to what you are told, and then repeating it self-righteously. You are incapable of critical thinking and have never opened an academic book in your life.
Yes, he was Aryan. That's why, you know, his Gospels were written in an Aryan language despite the lingua franca of the region being the Semitic Aramaic, and why his story was preached primarily to the Aryan world. It's also why his teachings have root in the Greek/Aryan philosophy rather than Jewish philosophy.
(395 BC) Plato - Crito [Benjamin Jowett]
Page 73
Socrates: Nor, when injured, injure in return, as the many imagine, for we must injure no one at all?
Crito: Clearly not.
Socrates: Again, Crito, may we do evil?
Crito: Surely not, Socrates.
Socrates: And what of doing evil in return for evil, which is the morality of the many - is that just or not?
Crito: Not just.
Socrates: For doing evil to another is the same as injuring him?
Crito: Very true.
Socrates: Then we ought not to retaliate or render evil for evil to anyone, whatever evil we may have suffered from him.
Luke 6:27-30, Names of God Bible
“But I tell everyone who is listening: Love your enemies. Be kind to those who hate you. Bless those who curse you. Pray for those who insult you. If someone strikes you on the cheek, offer the other cheek as well. If someone takes your coat, don’t stop him from taking your shirt. Give to everyone who asks you for something. If someone takes what is yours, don’t insist on getting it back.
Contrast this, of course, with the Jewish response to being wronged described in the OT, which is lex talionis, or "an eye for an eye". I realize this is all lost on someone like you: posting only for the lurkers.
