>>1211754Thanks for calling me a retard instead of providing a cogent answer to my question.
But in regards to your graphic, that says capitalism is a system where there is private property, voluntary exchange, a price system, competitive markets, and capital accumulation. In any free society of voluntary exchange, there will naturally be a price system, people will accumulate capital, and there will be markets. Traditionally communist countries counteract this with brute force. With laws that prevent private ownership of businesses, prevent accumulation of capital, prevent many types of voluntary exchange or voluntary agreements between people. The laws are backed up by the force of the police, military, secret police, etc. But if you take away government, what is there to stop people from opening/operating businesses, selling things, accumulating capital (i.e. saving money). It's a mystery to me.
The only thin I could think of is that in an anarcho-communist society there is supposed to be no private property whatsoever, but that basically means that "theft" as we think of it will be permitted. But, with no government I don't see how that situation will persist because people will end up owning and protecting their stuff. I don't think anarcho-capitalism will work due to complete absence of government, but at least in a/c theory, people will have incentives to form private police organizations to protect property. Who would form organizations to prevent such things as private property? I guess a mob maybe, but just letting mobs roam the countryside taking whatever they want and using violence against anyone who thinks they "own" something, that does not seem like a recipe for anything but a society of starvation and poverty.
