>>15578172Is this a refutation? You didn't disprove his point, you only 'justified' it. Then again, I don't exactly know what OP means by refutation either. Does he want us to show people don't like trannies, or it wasn't like this in 2008? And what would qualify and satisfy OP as refutation, a scientific paper? A logical argument? Maybe both. Or were you right and he meant "justify this"?
Too many questions, too little answers...
