>>15759753Feet are sensual because they look alien and awkward
compared to the very human looking hands.
The SEXUAL appeal feet have is similar to nubby berry ball limbs:
They look retarded and embarrassing ('m bare assed)
exactly like they are, defeated and enslaved for lesser purposes than hands.
Weight bearing body padding looks hot, asses look hot for the same reason.
boobs > feet > thighs > asses
The very fact that feet look nasty is what makes them attractive
"Imma put my GROSS feet on you!" like a mild sexual weapon.
This also makes them a bit gay, since they're one of the most masculine female features.
>women don't have nasty feetTomboys run around the yard barefoot.
Those who like complete submission from their women probably don't like feet.
They're like a slight barrier "Can you get past these babies?"
I personally like rape. Seeing feet means she's challenging you.
I like indications of a challenge, which feet are.
Loli means you don't like sexual challenges,
which figures because you always say "less work".
>There is nothing attractive about feet.The truth is there is nothing attractive about these lolis you like.
Women look like naughty thieves trying to sneak away barefoot with loads of delicious booty
if you instead prefer lolis then you have no concept of what women are sexually
and there's no other light to view them in than the two lines of text above this line of text.
