>>16680164I could be.
"That's not a sequel." Is that what you meant by inb4?
>>16680405I didn't expect you to, uneducated philistine that you are etc.
Those are usually the most vocal about it from what I've seen.
Idk, the progress is pretty extraordinary and this is just the commercially available stuff. The things still in development can create videos and 3d models etc. The main issue for most applications is processing power but that's gonna be worth the extra investment soon enough, especially if you can boot most of the creative staff.
But even then there's the matter of all concepting being rendered irrelevant already. Their primary function is creating quick visualizations of ideas which is exactly what these ai do only several thousand times more efficiently.
I genuinely can't imagine 'concept artist' being a title past 2025 at the very latest after they released stable diffusion to be run on people's home computers.
