>>17033740Complicated situation. I think people are more afraid of them than hateful. The service economy required permanently broken individuals to pay for perpetual services. Everyone exists in a state of permanent palliative care. This goes against the male impulse to fix what's broken. Trans identity is, even in their own conception, fixing what isn't right. Harmless on its own, mostly. Put that together with one of the other ruling powers of the moment, Actuarialism, and you have real problems. This economy to a great extent is women preying on women. No-one's good enough. No-one's smart enough. And doggone it, nobody likes you. And there's a service to help you manage it. Leads to the dominant spenders feeling profoundly unsafe at all times and demanding the state manage all risks to help them keep functioning. What happens when you have a group who's been told they're broken, need services, consumed services in a way designed to fix themselves, and are still being told by some no, you're now more broken, and told by another you're making us feel more unsafe by becoming simulacara of us. They're done what society wanted. They consumed services. They created new lines of business. And it's still not enough. A lot of women don't grasp the deplorable word is No. They want mercantile liberalism, with fetters. And the ones who grasp the best that there's only Yes now, happen to be the ones who imposed this order, who can give the most unloved but most progressive group considerable mid-level power. The question was always what turns trans into tranissary? The answer is progressive economic controls embedding themselves as best practices in all major societal organs, and marketing moving the narrative towards inelegant woke backlash. If you're a target for marketing now, you wear the Mark of the Beast. Which gives the Righteous free rein to do what they will to you. Between the conception, And the creation, Between the emotion, And the response, Falls the Shadow.
