>Atheists can't cope with the obvious truth that at some degree they employ religious belief at the very point that their skepticism ends, which it does at some point eventually end.

>Theists can't cope with the obvious truth that there is roughly no limit to the application of unprovable supernatural phenomenon to the natural world.

Both groups are fucking stupid, but if we are to look at this with structural integrity in mind, it would be far better that you are tilted towards spirituality. Now if you read my first statement again, you will notice that we are ALL tilted towards spirituality. It is more of a case of whether or not you are in denial about it.

This distills it down to the deeper question, is God real? The real question here is why do humans decide they prefer some words over other words? What people fail to recognize is that all too often we are talking about the same thing, but using different words. There is proof that human's motive capacity is tilted towards religiosity, and there is also proof that humans create semantic relationships that are subjective in nature. There is also proof that there are forces that dictate the existence of life outside of the definition of life. There you have it. God is real, and at best, you have simply chosen to use different words to describe what you are denying.