[262 / 120 / 66]
Quoted By: >>19780175 >>19780176 >>19780177 >>19780178 >>19780182 >>19780189 >>19780197 >>19780204 >>19780219 >>19780221 >>19780238 >>19780247 >>19780265 >>19780268 >>19780278 >>19780281 >>19780290 >>19780293 >>19780303 >>19780313 >>19780375 >>19780387 >>19780390 >>19780392 >>19780412 >>19780429 >>19781006
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q_source
>The "Two-source Hypothesis" proposes that the Gospels of Matthew and Luke were written independently, each using Mark and a second hypothetical document called "Q" as a source. Q was conceived as the most likely explanation behind the common material (mostly sayings) found in the Gospel of Matthew and the Gospel of Luke but not in the Gospel of Mark.
>Q's existence has been questioned.[6] ... Despite challenges, the two-source hypothesis retains wide support.[6]
>The "Two-source Hypothesis" proposes that the Gospels of Matthew and Luke were written independently, each using Mark and a second hypothetical document called "Q" as a source. Q was conceived as the most likely explanation behind the common material (mostly sayings) found in the Gospel of Matthew and the Gospel of Luke but not in the Gospel of Mark.
>Q's existence has been questioned.[6] ... Despite challenges, the two-source hypothesis retains wide support.[6]
