/bant/ - International/Random

[90 / 18 / ?]

Anonymous ID:b+7ettFb Fri 01 Sep 2017 02:53:18 No.2006458 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>2006460 >>2006461 >>2006464 >>2006467 >>2006472 >>2006478 >>2006513 >>2006526 >>2006549 >>2006564 >>2006572 >>2006680 >>2007549 >>2008229 >>2008707 >>2009264 >>2009881 >>2009905 >>2011338

Let's do this one again.
Please get it right this time burgers.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO CirnoGyateGyate.png, 60KiB, 420x248

Anonymous ID:hwoEeRom Fri 01 Sep 2017 02:54:22 No.2006460 Report

Quoted By: >>2008229

>>2006458
九

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:nlelA6z+ Fri 01 Sep 2017 02:54:25 No.2006461 Report

Quoted By: >>2006534

>>2006458
1

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:rY4OG1R1 Fri 01 Sep 2017 02:54:32 No.2006462 Report

Quoted By: >>2010092

!njFAGgotTM

!njFAGgotTM ID:kY+uDKLM Fri 01 Sep 2017 02:54:35 No.2006463 Report

Quoted By:

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:4Eu9b/sx Fri 01 Sep 2017 02:54:45 No.2006464 Report

Quoted By: >>2006476

>>2006458
9-4+1=5

oy vey

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Answer_is_cat.png, 106KiB, 500x500

Anonymous ID:+MycV9yc Fri 01 Sep 2017 02:55:05 No.2006467 Report

Quoted By:

>>2006458
Answer is 19?

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:jeYUrn9p Fri 01 Sep 2017 02:55:24 No.2006472 Report

Quoted By: >>2010092

>>2006458
9

!njFAGgotTM

!njFAGgotTM ID:kY+uDKLM Fri 01 Sep 2017 02:55:31 No.2006473 Report

Quoted By:

Solve:
1) 3 : 1/3 = 3 * 3 = 9
2) 9 - 9 = 0
3) 0 + 1 = 1

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:2rjIa6nD Fri 01 Sep 2017 02:55:44 No.2006475 Report

Quoted By: >>2006534

9 - 3 / (1/3) + 1
9 - 3 * 3 +1
9 - 9 + 1
0 + 1
1

EEEEEEEEASY

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:4Eu9b/sx Fri 01 Sep 2017 02:55:52 No.2006476 Report

Quoted By: >>2006534

>>2006464

shit, I mean 1. Goddamn it I'm high.

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:ttbeBQXH Fri 01 Sep 2017 02:56:19 No.2006478 Report

Quoted By: >>2010092

>>2006458
10

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:Hp2D0WJM Fri 01 Sep 2017 02:59:46 No.2006513 Report

Quoted By:

>>2006458
PEMDAS!

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:fO9QrdCl Fri 01 Sep 2017 03:00:22 No.2006526 Report

Quoted By: >>2006534

>>2006458
One

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:Hp2D0WJM Fri 01 Sep 2017 03:00:50 No.2006530 Report

Quoted By: >>2006633 >>2010092

It's negative 1 you fools!

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1482233177845.png, 166KiB, 637x770

Anonymous ID:b+7ettFb Fri 01 Sep 2017 03:01:15 No.2006534 Report

Quoted By: >>2007127

>>2006461
>>2006475
>>2006476
>>2006526
Better than last time.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1489250350358.jpg, 31KiB, 313x291

Anonymous ID:ocjPfBpG Fri 01 Sep 2017 03:02:04 No.2006549 Report

Quoted By: >>2006555 >>2006572 >>2006633 >>2009897

>>2006458
-1

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:Hp2D0WJM Fri 01 Sep 2017 03:02:42 No.2006555 Report

Quoted By: >>2006572

>>2006549
Ahahaha I waa right!
/bant/ needs to work on their elementary math skills

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:lxkMMfbJ Fri 01 Sep 2017 03:03:31 No.2006560 Report

Quoted By: >>2006575 >>2006591 >>2010092

please excuse my dear Aunt Sally

3 ÷ 1/3 = 1
1+1=2
9-2=7

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:vlLIEslc Fri 01 Sep 2017 03:04:26 No.2006564 Report

Quoted By: >>2010092

>>2006458
It's 2.333...
>you fucking idiots

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:ocjPfBpG Fri 01 Sep 2017 03:05:10 No.2006572 Report

Quoted By: >>2006633 >>2010092

>>2006458
>>2006555
>>2006549
PEMDAS
3 / (1/3) = 9
9 + 1 = 10
9 - 10 = -1

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Screenshot_20170831-220510.jpg, 18KiB, 353x679

Anonymous ID:Hp2D0WJM Fri 01 Sep 2017 03:05:29 No.2006575 Report

Quoted By: >>2010092

>>2006560
3÷(1/3) is not 1
It's 9.

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:lxkMMfbJ Fri 01 Sep 2017 03:07:01 No.2006591 Report

Quoted By: >>2010092

>>2006560
shit I'm drunk

3÷1/3=9
1+9=10
9-10=-1

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:b+7ettFb Fri 01 Sep 2017 03:11:01 No.2006633 Report

Quoted By: >>2006728

>>2006530
>>2006549
>>2006572
3/.333 = 9
9-9+1= 1
You don't prioritize addition over subtraction.
It would be -1 if you had 9-(9+1), otherwise it's 1.
https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=9-9%2B1

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1504010475055.png, 968KiB, 775x544

Anonymous ID:uzO60wow Fri 01 Sep 2017 03:14:55 No.2006680 Report

Quoted By: >>2006762

>>2006458

Kindergarten graduate here.

9 - 3 ÷ (1/3) + 1
9 - 9 + 1
0 + 1
1

PEDMAS
Division & Multiplication have the same priority.
Addition & Subtraction have the same priority.
You work left to right.

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:Hp2D0WJM Fri 01 Sep 2017 03:19:23 No.2006728 Report

Quoted By: >>2006762

>>2006633
>leaf math
Parenthesis
Exponent
Multiplication
Division
Addition
Subtract

Your answer would have been right with common core. The real world doesn't use common core faggot. Your math would have killed thousands!

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:b+7ettFb Fri 01 Sep 2017 03:22:23 No.2006762 Report

Quoted By: >>2006789

>>2006728
Not how PEMDAS works.
>>2006680

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:Hp2D0WJM Fri 01 Sep 2017 03:25:01 No.2006789 Report

Quoted By: >>2006850

>>2006762
Wrong.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1462641533150.jpg, 60KiB, 480x480

Anonymous ID:GjmF5VP1 Fri 01 Sep 2017 03:29:35 No.2006835 Report

Quoted By: >>2007003 >>2010092

>9 - 3 / (1/3) + 1 =
9 - 1 + 1 =
8 + 1 =
9 =

Am I fucking retarded?? Seriously, though. Back in high school this would be nothing, but I question my ability to do simple arithmetic now... :(

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:P7uBz7H4 Fri 01 Sep 2017 03:31:34 No.2006850 Report

Quoted By: >>2007582

>>2006789
OK you degenerates.
9-(3/(1/3))+1. PEMDAS motherfucker, do you know it?
(3/(1/3) = (3*(3/1). 3*3 = 9.
9-9+1=1.

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:b+7ettFb Fri 01 Sep 2017 03:47:30 No.2007003 Report

Quoted By:

>>2006835
3/(1/3) is 9.

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:CXSXW5WZ Fri 01 Sep 2017 04:00:31 No.2007127 Report

Quoted By:

>>2006534
Fucking retards.

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:M5N61VRq Fri 01 Sep 2017 05:17:57 No.2007549 Report

Quoted By:

>>2006458
Algebra is read left to right, and the order of operations dictates we divide first.
So this reads 9-(3/(1/3))+1, which is unambiguous.
It equals 1.

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:5RMEnNAP Fri 01 Sep 2017 05:19:43 No.2007563 Report

Quoted By: >>2010092

wait...is everyone stupid or am i wrong that this is -7

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:5RMEnNAP Fri 01 Sep 2017 05:23:23 No.2007582 Report

Quoted By:

>>2006850
this guy got it

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:fJqA7hE0 Fri 01 Sep 2017 08:37:09 No.2008229 Report

Quoted By:

>>2006458
>>2006460
答案为一。
先乘除,后加减。分数先处理,因此三分之一不动。三除以三分之一为九。现在加减就从左到右,九减九为零,零加一为一。答案是一。

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:cu6NI7di Fri 01 Sep 2017 10:25:03 No.2008687 Report

Quoted By: >>2009255 >>2010092

i'm enough of a smacktard to need paper for this
3 / 1/3 = 3/1 * 3/1
= 6
9 - 6 + 1 = 4
where did i fuck this up

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:bT4eqYOC Fri 01 Sep 2017 10:30:47 No.2008707 Report

Quoted By:

>>2006458
>do my h-homework for me! and g-get it right burgers! I bet you can't
Oh fuck off and go get your mommy to help you and pay attention in class, you fucking canacuck.

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:h23A8t3T Fri 01 Sep 2017 11:24:37 No.2009255 Report

Quoted By:

>>2008687
>3/1 * 3/1 = 6
Nigga what

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:u9i02dqJ Fri 01 Sep 2017 11:26:37 No.2009264 Report

Quoted By: >>2010092

>>2006458
0.125162517898928167676 rec.
this is the answer.

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:rSNgegJs Fri 01 Sep 2017 12:41:21 No.2009881 Report

Quoted By: >>2009913 >>2009918 >>2010092

>>2006458
>9 3 1 / 3 / - 1 + =
>put 9 on the stack
>put 3 on the stack
>put 1 on the stack
>take 2 items from the stack, divide the latter by the former and put the result on the stack
>>1 3 / 3 =
>>put 3 on the stack
>put 3 on the stack
>take 2 items from the stack, divide the latter by the former and put the result on the stack
>> 3 3 / 1 =
>> put 1 on the stack
>take 2 items from the stack, subtract the latter from the former and put the result on the stack
>> 1 9 - 8 =
>>put 8 on the stack
>put 1 on the stack
>take 2 items from the stack, add the latter to the former and put the result on the stack
>> 1 8 + 9 =
>> put 9 on the stack
>take 1 item from the stack
>> 9
9

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:8yMUGh19 Fri 01 Sep 2017 12:46:14 No.2009897 Report

Quoted By:

>>2006549
and as always, sataniaposters have the brain of a fucking teapot.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO wat.jpg, 47KiB, 640x454

Anonymous ID:JV8EX3u5 Fri 01 Sep 2017 12:47:36 No.2009905 Report

Quoted By: >>2009923

>>2006458
9-3/(1/3)+1
9-9+1
1

What's the problem here? It doesn't suffer from any ambiguities.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO tfw-this-shit-again.jpg, 6KiB, 139x150

Anonymous ID:JV8EX3u5 Fri 01 Sep 2017 12:49:27 No.2009913 Report

Quoted By:

>>2009881
>9 3 1 / 3 / - 1
You realize you have to interpret the infix expression correctly in the first place to produce that, right? And if you interpret it correctly, what exactly do you gain from converting it into postfix notation instead of computing it directly?

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:JV8EX3u5 Fri 01 Sep 2017 12:50:30 No.2009918 Report

Quoted By: >>2010636

>>2009881
By the way, you did not interpret the infix expression correctly.

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:2rjIa6nD Fri 01 Sep 2017 12:51:21 No.2009923 Report

Quoted By: >>2009930

>>2009905
3 / 1 / 3 confuses burgers.

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:2rjIa6nD Fri 01 Sep 2017 12:52:38 No.2009930 Report

Quoted By:

>>2009923
3 / ( 1 / 3 )*

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:8yMUGh19 Fri 01 Sep 2017 12:57:23 No.2010092 Report

Quoted By: >>2010304

>>2006462
>>2006472
>>2006478
>>2006530
>>2006560
>>2006572
>>2006564
>>2006575
>>2006591
>>2006835
>>2007563
>>2008687
>>2009264
>>2009881
okay, your family-friendly local rapist will teach you some elementary fricking maths
so we've got 9-3/1/3+1
we've got division, subtraction and addition.
and we all know division comes first,right?
so 3/1/3
if a number is divided with a fraction, it actually multiplies with the bottom number of the fraction which in this case is 3
so we've got 3*3=9
now its 9-9+1
if there are subtraction and addition in one exercise, we have to do subtraction first before doing the addition.
so its gonna be 9-9=0 followed by 0+1=1
thank you everyone, this has been elementary maths 101 and i hope you hated it.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO (you).jpg, 53KiB, 488x393

Anonymous ID:JV8EX3u5 Fri 01 Sep 2017 13:00:12 No.2010304 Report

Quoted By: >>2010591 >>2010655

>>2010092
>your family-friendly local rapist will teach you some elementary fricking maths
>so we've got 9-3/1/3+1
You're wrong right off the bat.
9-3/1/3+1
9-3/3+1
9-1+1
8+1
9

What we've got is actually 9-3/(1/3)+1=1

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 9ba5a2c42d94a3a28766410aafbd7254 (...).jpg, 30KiB, 350x321

Anonymous ID:IbVCh5L0 Fri 01 Sep 2017 13:03:37 No.2010327 Report

Quoted By:

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:8yMUGh19 Fri 01 Sep 2017 13:06:20 No.2010591 Report

Quoted By: >>2010635

>>2010304
well im sorry that i didn't "accurately" write it down.
but what you forgot to notice is that i mentioned in the post that ITS A FUCKING FRACTION EVEN IF I DIDN'T HIGHLIGHT IT WITH PARENTHESES!
also are you the same jew who argued on /v/ about the copyright problem with making an unofficial "HL3" using the leaked storyline?

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:JV8EX3u5 Fri 01 Sep 2017 13:13:06 No.2010635 Report

Quoted By:

>>2010591
>incorrectly interprets the expression
>incorrectly solves his incorrect expression
>b-but i s-said it was a fraction

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:rSNgegJs Fri 01 Sep 2017 13:13:10 No.2010636 Report

Quoted By: >>2010664

>>2009918
>9 - 3 / 1 / 3 + 1
>find rightmost operator with the lowest priority, convert its left argument, convert its right argument and concatenate the two together, then concatenate them with the operator and return the result
>> 9 - 3 / 1 / 3
>>find rightmost operator with the lowest priority, convert its left argument, convert its right argument and concatenate the two together, then concatenate them with the operator and return the result
>>> 9
>>>not an operator, return it
>>> 3 / 1 / 3
>>>find rightmost operator with the lowest priority, convert its left argument, convert its right argument and concatenate the two together, then concatenate them with the operator and return the result
>>>> 3 / 1
>>>>find rightmost operator with the lowest priority, convert its left argument, convert its right argument and concatenate the two together, then concatenate them with the operator and return the result
>>>>> 3
>>>>>not an operator, return it
>>>>> 1
>>>>>not an operator, return it
>>>>returned 3 1 /
>>>> 3
>>>>not an operator, return it
>>>returned 3 1 / 3 /
>>returned 9 3 1 / 3 / -
>> 1
>>not an operator, return it
>returned 9 3 1 / 3 / - 1 +

What seems to be the problem m80?

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:t1ob91fi Fri 01 Sep 2017 13:17:34 No.2010655 Report

Quoted By:

>>2010304
>2010304
>3/0,3333...
>1
yes

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:JV8EX3u5 Fri 01 Sep 2017 13:19:37 No.2010664 Report

Quoted By: >>2010698

>>2010636
>What seems to be the problem
The problem is that postfix expression is incorrect and your approach is redundant. The correct expression would be 9 3 1 3 / / - 1 +, but if you know enough to reach it, you already know enough to evaluate the original infix notation correctly, so it's a waste of time.

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:rSNgegJs Fri 01 Sep 2017 13:24:29 No.2010698 Report

Quoted By: >>2010761

>>2010664
But your expression converted back to infix makes 9 - 3 / ( 1 / 3 ) + 1, not 9 - 3 / 1 / 3 + 1.

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:rSNgegJs Fri 01 Sep 2017 13:27:18 No.2010714 Report

Quoted By: >>2010766

I'm POLISH and I know how to use reverse POLISH notation, fucking Jew.

This is why we gassed you.

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:JV8EX3u5 Fri 01 Sep 2017 13:34:01 No.2010761 Report

Quoted By: >>2010773

>>2010698
>your expression converted back to infix makes 9 - 3 / ( 1 / 3 ) + 1
Yes, and this is correct. What you did is wrong and fundamentally useless. Why are you so dense? Evaluating the original expression involves writing it down correctly and knowing the order of operations. Converting the original expression to postfix correctly involves writing it down correctly, knowing the order of operations, knowing how to write down a postfix expression based on this knowledge, and knowing how to interpret the resulting postfix expression. Basically, you have two extra useless steps and you already fail at step 1.

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:JV8EX3u5 Fri 01 Sep 2017 13:34:40 No.2010766 Report

Quoted By:

>>2010714
>I know how to use reverse POLISH notation
Yes, and it still didn't help you solve a basic arithmetic problem, you fucking moron. That's why your approach is inherently useless.

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:rSNgegJs Fri 01 Sep 2017 13:35:39 No.2010773 Report

Quoted By: >>2010777

>>2010761
I don't know about your Asian shithole but in civilized world we evaluate the expressions left to right.

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:JV8EX3u5 Fri 01 Sep 2017 13:36:23 No.2010777 Report

Quoted By: >>2010851

>>2010773
You're a fucking moron who doesn't know what a fraction is. Kill yourself.

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:rSNgegJs Fri 01 Sep 2017 13:48:45 No.2010851 Report

Quoted By: >>2010858

>>2010777
It's another way of writing down division, you moron.
3 \div \frac{1}{3} = 3 \div 1 \div 3 = \frac{\frac{3}{1}}{3}
3 \div (1 \div 3) = \frac{3}{1 \div 3} = \frac{3}{\frac{1}{3}}

Don't let mixed notation confuse you, m89.

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:JV8EX3u5 Fri 01 Sep 2017 13:50:35 No.2010858 Report

Quoted By: >>2010894 >>2010960

>>2010851
You're subhuman and objectively wrong. The answer is 1. The fact that your approach gives you 9 proves that it's retarded and useless. Objective facts are not up for debate. Move on.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO nigdetspinner.gif, 240KiB, 320x320

Anonymous ID:rSNgegJs Fri 01 Sep 2017 13:56:15 No.2010894 Report

Quoted By: >>2010914

>>2010858
>Objective facts
You haven't provided any this far.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO polan-cannot-into-arithmetic.png, 105KiB, 1348x564

Anonymous ID:JV8EX3u5 Fri 01 Sep 2017 13:59:25 No.2010914 Report

Quoted By: >>2010955

>>2010894
If you don't understand this image and still think the result should be 9, you are subhuman.

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:I7N+rZ6T Fri 01 Sep 2017 14:00:11 No.2010922 Report

Quoted By:

its about 3.50

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:rSNgegJs Fri 01 Sep 2017 14:04:54 No.2010955 Report

Quoted By: >>2010965 >>2011210

>>2010914
>division has higher precedence than + and -
Correct
>division has higher precedence than division just because you write it differently
This is not correct.
⅓ is just a different way of writing 1/ 3 and so 3 / ⅓ is the same as 3 / 1 / 3.

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:pYJWD7oX Fri 01 Sep 2017 14:05:35 No.2010960 Report

Quoted By:

>>2010858
objective facts are fake news

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:JV8EX3u5 Fri 01 Sep 2017 14:06:15 No.2010965 Report

Quoted By: >>2011279

>>2010955
All mentally competent humans who know what a fraction is can see that it says "divide 3 by one third". It's impossible to explain to a subhuman degenerate that he is one. Have a nice day.

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:JV8EX3u5 Fri 01 Sep 2017 14:07:48 No.2011210 Report

Quoted By: >>2011279

>>2010955
>⅓ is just a different way of writing 1/ 3
Yes.
>and so 3 / ⅓ is the same as 3 / 1 / 3.
This is a logical non-sequitur. Please kill your parents (so that they could not produce more "people" like you) and then yourself.

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:rSNgegJs Fri 01 Sep 2017 14:18:06 No.2011279 Report

Quoted By: >>2011297 >>2011304

>>2010965
All mentally competent humans who know what a fraction is can see "divide 3 by one third" is the same as "divide 3 by one, divide by three". I thought elementary school math was important for degenerate subhumans like you to count your shekels but looks like you cannot even do that. Have a nice day.

>>2011210
If ⅓ = 1/ 3, on which you just agreed, then where's the non sequitur? I fail to see one. Maybe you need a simpler example?
I'll switch to addition and multiplication cause you use these more often for counting your shekels. If x = 2 + 2, what is 2 * x?

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:rSNgegJs Fri 01 Sep 2017 14:21:40 No.2011297 Report

Quoted By: >>2011314

>>2011279
I started with computer algorithms so I'll write a very simple program to help you solve this problem:

#define x 2 + 2
int main(void) { return 2 * x; }

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1496998730043.jpg, 33KiB, 493x386

Anonymous ID:JV8EX3u5 Fri 01 Sep 2017 14:22:40 No.2011304 Report

Quoted By: >>2011315

>>2011279
>"divide 3 by one third" is the same as "divide 3 by one, divide by three"
Only a literal subhuman could ever say something so dumb.

>If x = 2 + 2, what is 2 * x?
According to your subhuman Polish logic, it is 2 * 2 + 2, because x is 2 + 2, so in your subhuman mind, you can just replace "x" with "2 + 2" and it will work. You really need to be euthanized.

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:JV8EX3u5 Fri 01 Sep 2017 14:24:04 No.2011314 Report

Quoted By: >>2011328

>>2011297
>i-i was only trolling
>i'm not really retarded
I'm glad you're finally starting to realize your mistake, but it's far too late. I know you're unironically so dumb that it took you 10 posts to understand what you were doing wrong.

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:rSNgegJs Fri 01 Sep 2017 14:24:06 No.2011315 Report

Quoted By: >>2011318

>>2011304
None of your insult is an argument, Shlomo.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1496690244379.jpg, 43KiB, 390x470

Anonymous ID:JV8EX3u5 Fri 01 Sep 2017 14:24:47 No.2011318 Report

Quoted By:

>>2011315
>g-g-guys i was only trolling! i swear!
Thanks for the entertainment, literal retard.

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:rSNgegJs Fri 01 Sep 2017 14:25:37 No.2011328 Report

Quoted By: >>2011343 >>2011352

>>2011314
Surprise! It returns 6.

Got anything else to add? I don't think so, judging on your arguments to insults ratio which is still 0.

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:CfD/AwOn Fri 01 Sep 2017 14:26:57 No.2011338 Report

Quoted By:

>>2006458

FIRST OFF OBELUS IS NOT FRACTION. YOU NIGGERS ARE PUTTING SHIT INTO FRACTIONS THAT DON'T BELONG.

SECOND, SINCE THERE ARE NO FRACTIONS AND THERE ARE NO PARENTHESIS, WE GO LEFT TO RIGHT MULTIPLY/DIVIDE THEN ADD SUBTRACT

3 DIVIDED BY 1/3 is 9.00000000009
No one gives a shit about these zeroes so we'll round it to 9.
9 - 9 + 1 = 1

9 - 3 ÷ 1 / 3 + 1 DOES NOT EQUAL 9 - 3 / 1 / 3 + 1

It's Jew math but easily predictable if you see past the kikery.

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:rSNgegJs Fri 01 Sep 2017 14:28:07 No.2011343 Report

Quoted By:

>>2011328
judging by*, inb4 you start using my language skills as an (argument)

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:JV8EX3u5 Fri 01 Sep 2017 14:29:22 No.2011352 Report

Quoted By: >>2011373

>>2011328
This is really not gonna help you now. You're not going to pass of your genuine stupidity as trolling.

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:rSNgegJs Fri 01 Sep 2017 14:32:33 No.2011373 Report

Quoted By: >>2011383

>>2011352
There's no point to continue the discussion since you seem to have run out of arguments. I'm glad to see you finally acknowledged that you were wrong from the beginning.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1497573605480.jpg, 60KiB, 500x495

Anonymous ID:JV8EX3u5 Fri 01 Sep 2017 14:33:52 No.2011383 Report

Quoted By:

>>2011373
>g-g-guys i'm only trolling
>lel look at me trolling now
>that's what i was doing all along, i swear

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:rSNgegJs Fri 01 Sep 2017 14:34:45 No.2011389 Report

Quoted By: >>2011467

Whomst are you quoting?

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:rSNgegJs Fri 01 Sep 2017 14:37:52 No.2011415 Report

Quoted By: >>2011467

desu I don't know why your sudden implications surprised me. I've seen your abilities to fuck the logic in previous posts.

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:JV8EX3u5 Fri 01 Sep 2017 14:46:50 No.2011467 Report

Quoted By:

>>2011389
>>2011415
>maybe if i keep pretending to be trolling, someone will believe me
Nope. You're just humiliating yourself further with your vain attempt to save face.

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:rSNgegJs Fri 01 Sep 2017 14:48:33 No.2011480 Report

Quoted By: >>2011492

I'm not trolling or pretending to be. But I start thinking it was you trolling all the time. You can't be this retarded.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO apu-thumbs-up.png, 31KiB, 720x644

Anonymous ID:JV8EX3u5 Fri 01 Sep 2017 14:50:32 No.2011492 Report

Quoted By:

>>2011480
Keep trying. I'm sure it'll work eventually.

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:rSNgegJs Fri 01 Sep 2017 14:51:36 No.2011498 Report

Quoted By: >>2011500

>I lost but at least I'll have the last word
Better give back all the (You)s I wasted on your trolls.

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:JV8EX3u5 Fri 01 Sep 2017 14:52:25 No.2011500 Report

Quoted By:

>>2011498
>please! please believe me! i was only trolling! i beg you, i'm not an actual retard!
Nope.

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:kFjzyFf2 Fri 01 Sep 2017 15:00:56 No.2011559 Report

Quoted By:

Order of operations demands division be handled first.
three divided by one third is nine.
nine minus nine plus one equals one.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches