>>20315621That's not the same statement though. If you're arguing that a race is superior based on it's outliers/elites, then whites are already superior. If you're arguing that races are superior or inferior based on the majority, then whites are superior based on the fact that at any given demographic, whites do better than other races.
If you mix both those arguments, it STILL proves that whites are better.
There is no situation in which any race is either by measure of its "elites" or by its majority superior to Native Europeans.
Going even further, there are no successful unmixed africans in america; literally every african in america has a significant deal of white blood in them, and the most accomplished and gifted "african americans" have demonstrably more white blood in them than others.
If we're talking about "tendency for success/accomplishment/giftedness" as a result of genetics, that tendency clearly correlates only to European genes and to no others.
