>>4155930Also.
Western partners supported Yeltsin, he actually organized an armed attack.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QLxeoXnMpOE>>4155947I think you will understand
In 1993, in Russia there was a confrontation of democratic forces with the autocracy of Yeltsin. The prehistory is as follows. All the republics of the USSR were parliamentary. They had their own parliaments, in the RSFSR it was the supreme council. Therefore, after the collapse of the USSR, Russia remained a parliamentary republic. These times were characterized by atypical phenomena for Russia. Parliament really was democratic. The court was indeed independent. Yeltsin was in the Supreme Council, then he go the post of president, becoming executive power. In fact, there was democracy and separation of powers in parliamentary Russia. In order to conduct privatization, the parliament gives Yeltsin extraordinary powers. Yeltsin, with his goal, copes not very good, instead of normal privatization, he was engaged in enriching his friends through "pledge auctions" and sabotage activities against the parliament. The result was the "pre-default" state. Therefore, in 1993, when the terms of Yeltsin's emergency powers expire, the parliament refuses to renew them. Yeltsin dissolves the parliament. But the Supreme Court recognizes this decision as illegal. The parliament declares impeachment to Yeltsin. Yeltsin enlisted the support of one of his friend the general, - introduces troops to the capital, shoots at supporters of parliament from automatic weapons.
Then Yeltsin introduces his constitution to the "referendum" and organizes a puppet parliament and continues to do his job.
