>>6728740Yeah, the cityfolk probably shoot the "gay" % up by 1 or 2% on their own :^)
>>6728751I understand that via the data provided it is accurate, but it just doesn't feel right, and I wouldn't be surprised if the data were inaccurate to *some* capacity. Not like any study that supposedly is representative of the world population is truly representative. I mean, I don't know anything, I'm just talking out of hypotheticals and anecdotes. I just think it seems odd!