>>7015642>People could be classified as clines but there would be far more clines than what we have for the typical historical definitions of raceThat's what I believe is the case.
Also, while you could genetically trace people all the way down to families and tribes, there are still similarities within large populations which is what separates races (although not in the traditional way with blacks, browns, whites etc.)
However, there is still a lot variability within populations and races existing doesn't necessarily mean that the crap that /pol/ tends to spew is accurate.
>>7015768>Depending upon which adaptive trait is chosen, one will get very different “races”. So which adaptive traits should be used and which should be ignored? I guess the most commonly shared genes within a population will be of most use to differentiate humans.
Correct me if I'm wrong but that's how populations of organisms are classified, right?