>>7840793True.
>>7840809>why do you need more than one proofBecause your GPS doesn't work with one satelite. It requires all three of them to show all necessary data. Would you base your belief that dinosaurs existed, just because birds fly away when they hear a loud roar? There's no singular evidence of black holes phenomena that could make us sure that they actually exist in a form we predict them to be.
Please, even if my response seems retarded, meditate about your own logic on this.
>what about occam's razor?Are you really bringing angels on a razor as anything more than metaphor?
>so stephen hawking discovered hawking radiation emitted by black holes while we were technically still not sure the things themselves existed? pff, theoretical physics my assYes.
