>>9145995You really think it's a good thing for there to be so many cirno threads up? What if instead of 13 it was 15? Or 20? Or 50? When would it be high enough that you'd realise that they're all unoriginal, interchangeable threads?
>>9146004>any fucking thread from /pol/ or /int/ has even a tiniest chance of being good/int/ is pretty mediocre, but /pol/ is a good board. And /bant/ was partially made to stop non-political posts from being posted on /pol/ anyway. So /bant/ is basically a daughter-board to /pol/
>fucking touristI've been here since /bant/ was at 1.2mil posts back in July 2017 and I've always just ignored the cirno threads because usually there's only been a few of them, which doesn't really matter. But lately, there's been fucking heaps of them.
>Do you even now what flooding is, you fucking cunt?It's not a constant flood, but a gradual one. But still a flood nonetheless.
>as long as you don't bring and apply board culture>or cancerous mentality in case it's one of the local normalfag centralsSo because I think it's a bad thing there are 13 threads about the same thing on /bant/ right now, that means I'm being cancerous?
> >/>9145952>tries to deny me a (You)>still replies to me, so basically get a (You) anyway 
