[54 / 31 / ?]
Quoted By: >>9555173
Just recently there came news about a huge impact crater in greenland that is possibly 12.000-15.000 years old
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/2018/11/impact-crater-found-under-hiawatha-glacier-greenland-ice/
Metallic mini particles from that time hinting to a huge impact from around the same time
https://phys.org/news/2012-09-theory-impact-event-years.html
http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/695703
clearly says there was a mass amount of biomass burning at the same time
and göbekli tepe speaking of exactly that event at the exact time
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2017/04/21/ancient-stone-carvings-confirm-comet-struck-earth-10950bc-wiping/
additionally Hancock spoke about the alignment of the Pyramids and Angkor wat from precisely that point in time before ANY of the news above came out.
For reference, on the other hand we have people like Zahi Hawass shilling the standard model
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q4NnCAZcxHg
remember the first guy was/is in charge of excavations in egypt, and pretty much blocks every attempt of any study and appearently never even heard about göbekli tepe. thats a guy that is seen as an authority on the subject. let that sink in
In one of hancocks documentaries, quest for the lost civilization he has a talk with zahi hawass where you see again that he pretty much denies any alternative theory without even considering it
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T5DNvYMtkyk
43:55
Now i wonder who is more credible?
pic related by the way is found across the world over and over again. no idea what its supposed to be though. heard people suggesting its a rudimentary depiction of atlantis, the world tree, the brain. but no idea really. just look up "labirynth petroglyph"
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/2018/11/impact-crater-found-under-hiawatha-glacier-greenland-ice/
Metallic mini particles from that time hinting to a huge impact from around the same time
https://phys.org/news/2012-09-theory-impact-event-years.html
http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/695703
clearly says there was a mass amount of biomass burning at the same time
and göbekli tepe speaking of exactly that event at the exact time
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2017/04/21/ancient-stone-carvings-confirm-comet-struck-earth-10950bc-wiping/
additionally Hancock spoke about the alignment of the Pyramids and Angkor wat from precisely that point in time before ANY of the news above came out.
For reference, on the other hand we have people like Zahi Hawass shilling the standard model
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q4NnCAZcxHg
remember the first guy was/is in charge of excavations in egypt, and pretty much blocks every attempt of any study and appearently never even heard about göbekli tepe. thats a guy that is seen as an authority on the subject. let that sink in
In one of hancocks documentaries, quest for the lost civilization he has a talk with zahi hawass where you see again that he pretty much denies any alternative theory without even considering it
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T5DNvYMtkyk
43:55
Now i wonder who is more credible?
pic related by the way is found across the world over and over again. no idea what its supposed to be though. heard people suggesting its a rudimentary depiction of atlantis, the world tree, the brain. but no idea really. just look up "labirynth petroglyph"
