>>4175643>no uI don't settle for low quality art made by humans and I won't be accepting low quality art made by computers. Who wants to save images of slightly off-character images? Also I would use "outcompete" as it's a poor substitute. Doesn't help that in most images, their hands or portions of the image are deformed.
Like
>>4174778 looks like a girl cosplaying as Sucy and clearly isn't her - what's the point of lowering the bar? AI art is interesting and has potential, but it's a waste of space in its current state and people who save and repost it are only helping post lower quality "art".
