>>2993601Source has been posted here
>>2993551and here
>>2993578providing the very proof you pretend doesn't exist. You're the one refusing to address the reality of the situation here, not me.
>I never said it was successful>I never implied I made an argument. So your post was nothing but hot air then? Good, because that was my point.
>Which shows personal bias, yes. But that doesn't really prove any wide spanning conspiracy. >Which is unfortunately unknown as to if it's intentional or by accident. >Not really, but if you want to make that argument, again, personal bias. And nothing proves that it's intentional either. >You haven't. You've laid down a series of (subjective) claims that you've failed to source. That's it.See how you're the one in full denial here? You're not actually providing any counter arguments here. The facts are that Anno is biased against Rei, and coupled with the fact that the work he has made after EoE also has the same bias, we have the most likely explanation for the current direction in the franchise.
>I'd say no actuallyand you'd be a lying, non-Reifag interloper. The very fact that you're here proves just how desperate you are.
