>>3006522Ok I'm just gonna dial this back since you are clearly incapable of simple abstraction and logical inference.
You have proven that she is "incidentally" or "accidentally" shameless, which was never in question.
You have proven that she is shameless by her own flawed definition, which was also never in question.
I have argued that she is not "wilfully" or "intentionally" shameless, and therefore not "just as shameless" as you which was the initial point I was arguing against.
If you really can't make this distinction, and you seriously want to equate her selfless support of the sibling relationship, sacrificing both her clearly expressed sensibilities and romantic feelings, to your purchase of this
>>2997982 ecchi mousemat, then you are beyond hope let alone reason and I have nothing more to say to you
