>>2905864This is really good.
>>2906032>>2905961My eyes must be worse, because I can't tell what the change was at all. What was it? also
>implying I won't save everything for posterityWIP art is the best.
>>2905874>An audience has an obligation to accept a different version of the same character as a different version of the same character. >Each individual is free to prefer a particular version of a character.Both of which, are logically equivalent with not being obligated to accept two versions or just similar characters as the same character. Which again feeds back into my original point, that the audience reaction is perfectly understandable, rational and to be expected. Hence why your accusation was just pointless drivel. I'm glad we got through this one.
However this:
>Demanding people share your opinion and follow your "rules" regarding Rei Q is an unfunny joke.is not a matter of an opinion, but of facts, and as we've established above, and you agree, is that Rei Q is not Rei. You are obligated to accept this, and it is an unfunny joke for you to push your "opinion" that she is, and rules regarding Rei Q, on a thread that does not want it. You are free to make your own thread. /c/ is based upon this loosely enforced idea. It is possible to post Rei in the Asuka thread, but we don't.
Moving on:
>Deny the validity of Rebuild and that is all you have left.It's not the validity of Rebuild itself that is denied here, but it can certainly be done. Thus you missed the point again, as the point was that the contents of Rebuild, NGE and so on take priority over things outside the works. We can show that Rei Q is not like Rei from 2.0 or NGE using only Rebuild and NGE, and that is the final proof. Even if Anno were to disagree or agree, we can discard his authority in cases where the work he made contradicts him.
The plain truth trumps someone's biased spin on it. This is just healthy common sense, and your hypotheticals were moot anyway.
