>>2848017Exactly my point. So if the population of white pedophiles was proportionally smaller than the total population of white people then it would imply that white people are less likely to be pedophiles and therefore do not have the basis of being discriminated against in the name of anti-pedophilia.
I'm gonna need some statistics on that honestly. Exactly what damages have been incurred that is unlawful or criminal? Just telling me "it was a whole lotta money kiddo" isn't going to prove you right.
But that's the fucking problem you retard. What exactly defines prejudice? What defines narrow mindedness? Why can't the definition of either change tomorrow morning? What objective standpoint is there that ensures that they are constant and infalliable?
You can't just throw words at a wall and expect them to stick.
If you don't even understand a word of what I'm saying, why are you even here?
Show me proof that whites account for a proportional majority of pedophiles and white collar criminals, then you have a basis. Show me proof that said statistics are consistent and do not change with time and as such cannot be attributed to a chronological event or time period. Then you have a basis.
Also, the reason why whites seem to form the majority of white collar criminals is because they are the majority of white collar workers. What, you expect Tyrone to be the CFO of Coca Cola if he didn't even pass high school?
You need to grow the fuck up and leave your hugbox. All you've done so far is attempt to use vague words to justify your completely liquid definition of bigotry, and when asked to give objective information you say "objectivity is irrelevant". Exactly what is your goal in this and who are you trying to convince by blatantly denying and ignoring reality?
