>>2848018Like I said, pick up a dictionary. You're clearly behind in language comprehension. Narrow-mindedness and prejudice are extremely simple to define, and easier to look up:
- The inability to consider or seek out contradicting facts
- To judge before knowing
Since you think "bigotry" is a good thing, then you've clearly not understood what bigotry is. You claim to be informed and to make the judgment on sound basis, while also defending that you are a bigot or that bigotry is good! Nothing about this vague or difficult to understand. Do you not see how you are in direct contradiction with your own claims?
>Also, the reason why whites seem to form the majority of white collar criminals is because they are the majority of white collar workers. What, you expect Tyrone to be the CFO of Coca Cola if he didn't even pass high school? Precisely my point. Do you expect the CEO of a major banking firm to rob someone in the streets, when all he has to do is funnel some money where no one sees it? FBI has plenty of studies on behaviors in crime, I suggest you get educated.
I've also never said objectivity is irrelevant, I've said that these statistics in specific are irrelevant insofar defining bigotry or prejudice goes. You can be just as bigoted in denying them as you can overextending their importance.
As for "hugbox", you've been banned and chased out of this thread more than once. Are you rearing for another posting vacation? I suggest you take this to /pol/ and pick up a dictionary.
