>>3111614>It's almost like it was a meta defense of Rei showing what such a character would look like! How does that even make sense? Rei was already defined in NGE, that's what Rei "looks like" already. In addition, you can't show what something is by fundamentally altering what it is in the first place. What you're doing is making a strawman, a travesty - which is what Rei Q is.
>Also, the Earth is flat and jet fire cant melt steel.Pathetic misdirection. You're simply running away from the facts again.
>Willful misreading. Not a willful misreading, but their own words. Again it would seem that you lack anything factual to rely on. I can see this is a trend against people who play the role of "inconspicious bystander defending Rei Q that swears they like Rei". No, you don't. In fact like I said earlier, it doesn't matter what you do, what matters is the fact. Fuck your worthless fake opinion.