>>4171869>ecchi (...) even if not lewdthat's a contradiction
>/c/ isn't for ecchi, even if you want to challenge that.I don't
>Ecchi can be cute, but that doesn't make it /c/ appropriate.I agree
>*Ecchi covers many topics some sexual some nonsexual - your post has very revealing clothing with nudity conveniently censored, that is ecchi even if non-lewd.*You don't understand what ecchi is. Ecchi is always sexual and always lewd. It stems from the same root as erotic
>Again feel free to make a nudity thread and see what happens.I see no sense in that. My whole argument is that you can portray nudity without making nudity the point of the portrayal, i.e. coincidental nudity. Making a thread about that would be contradictory in itself.
On the other hand you can look around large /c/ threads up right now and find dozens over dozens of pictures that are actually lewd, not because girls in them don't wear clothes, but because the focus of the portrayal is on erotic stimulus
