>>3412037doesn't mean i can't still think its extremely cancerous - attaching a name to a post provides nothing of value
there are some good namefags on /c/ that have been around for ages who i can say have contributed some good stuff, no one in this thread is on that list. people here just want to attach a name onto their post as it seems that they just want the attention and credit for their contributions (many being very low quality images or unrelated to /c/, such as that crossdressing image above which did not involve nonon). this thread is slowly turning into a circlejerk and i'm not sure why people are joining in
