>>3547072>PokemonPic very related.
>>3545102>1As to whether or not she, broadly, likes art I cannot say, but she has a penchant for those pieces one might consider macabre or dark. Anything that compels her to feel, anything that she gazes upon and recognizes that the artist managed to translate something that she feels all too often into art touches her soul. Generally, too, she likes art that is dark, strange, and perhaps a little twisted.
>2Insofar as it doesn't interfere with her emotional balance, she'll give it a chance. With people, however, the situation is admittedly precarious; she, as I've explained before, has constructed an emotional bastion with trust checks for arrow slits. She wants to give everyone a chance, but she simply cannot risk being betrayed or hurt - it would dishevel her too much.
>3Old. No question. The modern is too flashy, technological, and gaudy in an inelegant way. Whether it be an old tome or archaic sculptures, she'll choose anything old over a better working, newer counterpart (within reason).
>4She has a definite predilection for anything that she can either empathize with or that can empathize with her. As such, those things that translate emotion into reality - poetry, prose, paintings, and any similar proclivities are things she appreciates.
>5Depends on the quality of the museum. Presuming history or some such topic, she would react much like I would in that we would both spend far too much time admiring things with historical or emotional significance. The experience would be not dissimilar to visiting a country with extreme classical significance; whilst the rest are at the beaches or seeing the basic attractions, we would delve deeply into and admire anything and everything with significance or pertinence.
>>3545131If she completely lost it - however unlikely - she could misuse her powers or, comically, summon her father to tell him to fuck off and, in doing so, bring about the apocalypse. No biggie.
